Archive for October, 2009

Online Coursework Gripes

Less than a week into the online courses and it’s making me uncomfortable.  Keep trying to tell myself to bide my time, get a few courses under my belt (particularly these needed economics and political science prerequisites) before doing anything drastic or pitching attitude.  Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (1)

Hump-Day Update

Classes have started so my time is very limited.  Probably will stay this way quite a while.  Ah well.  Such is life.  Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

A Beautiful Mind

Just watched this movie last night a friend and loved it.  I didn’t know much about John Nash and am now interested in learning more, particularly about his theory of equilibrium (i.e., the “prisoners’ dilemma”).  But it will have to wait for another night.  Very, very busy lately.

Leave a Comment

Minors present?

Hmmm…learned last night that a well-publicized “hobby” party hosted by a well-known provider involved her minor child being in attendance.  This I am not okay with. Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Conversations with Hobbyists, Part 4

This week’s correspondences with a big-time hobbyist.  I met this man once socially, never as my client, and occasionally interact with him online.  His responses will be in blue. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (2)

Pitching a fit

Today I am miserable.  Or at least tonight.  First I made the mistake of looking at this month’s cell phone bill.  Goddamn overage charges.  Seething…oh…my…god.  Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (2)

“Teeth”

Just finished watching the film “Teeth” (2006), which was better than I originally expected.  I’d only heard it compared with the film “Deadgirl” which sucked on so many levels as to be completely pathetic, so I assumed this would be a senseless violence flick as the other had been.  But no.  Instead, it has wonderful acting, a plot you can at least follow, and confronts a real issue young women are confronted with: sexual assault and mishandling.  The premise is that the lead actress has “vagina dentata” where her vagina, by some weird mutation that’s never explained, has serrated teeth much like those of a shark.  The leading lady isn’t going looking for trouble and is in fact a virgin when trouble finds her.

Trailer:

I liked this film considerably more than “Deadgirl” and not simply because the protagonist is female.  Goes much deeper than that.  “Deadgirl” was violent for the sake of being violent.  In “Teeth,” the gal is trying to maintain her sexual purity in a culture obsessed with sex, fending off boys who otherwise would have left her as the weeping, powerless victim.  In “Deadgirl,” the protagonist turns into a rapist and was in no way coerced into accepting that fate.  “Teeth” is nice in that it presents a fantasy of sorts, not of possessing a toothed vagina but of being able to protect yourself to some extent against sexual violence.  And it’s not as though the protagonist was attack-proof; her vagina just had the capability of biting off penises and fingers.  Come at her with a gun and force anal sex and she’d have no greater means of protection than any other female.

It’s not about “hating” men or wishing harm upon them, at least not for me.  It’s just that it would be nice if something, somehow, existed to thwart men’s brawny overpowering of women and made them think twice before treating rape like no big deal.  Seems to me that men care more about an organ on their bodies than they do about womankind as an aggregate.  Tell me, when did penises become of such supreme importance?  You don’t see women running around worshiping our vulvae and uteri anywhere near to the extent that men commonly celebrate their penises.  I just don’t get it.  Seen a few penises, you’ve seen them all basically.  The penis itself means absolutely nothing, IMO, if not attached to a man worth caring for.  And I say this as a sex worker who has seen my fair share of penises, both in and out of the “hobby.”  The novelty wore off for me long ago, probably back in my teenage years when I realized sex has everything to do with individuals and interpersonal connections and much less to do with one’s anatomical proportions.  I wish more men would understand this.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and connections absolutely do matter.  What our culture does to virgins is a damn shame, giving young people the impression that virginity is the last thing they ought to be concerned with protecting.  Myself, I was 12 years old when I chose to have sex for the first time.  My reasoning was simple: I wanted to get losing my virginity “out of the way.”  Isn’t that a sad way of looking at things for people so young and impressionable?  I used to not think so and, in fact, only began realizing the err of my ways in recent years.  Not that a person has to be a Christian or a moralist to grasp that their body need not be shared with others who don’t genuinely appreciate it.  It’s as if we have spite toward those who choose not to share themselves in full with whoever asks…’course we have spite for those who choose to as well.  Seems you truly cannot win, not as a female, not these days.  Sex is absolutely expected, and you are treated as abnormal if you decline or refuse.

Isn’t that odd?  I find it very strange.

Not to mention the lies we tell one another to pressure for sex and attention.  Too much sex on the brain, if you ask me.  Seems we need to get lives that don’t revolve incessantly around what’s happening in our pants.  Hormones matter, but not as much as we seem to think.  Human nature matters too, but accepting this doesn’t negate the need for self-control.  I’m tired of hearing people argue that we can’t expect better than violence, rape, competition, and underhanded manipulation tactics from our fellow man because we’re helpless apes driven by hormones and ‘human nature’ beyond our control.  Bullshit.  We didn’t develop this complex frontal lobe and a sense of self-conscious self-awareness just so that we could throw our hands in the air and pretend to be developmentally-challenged and incapable of discerning right from wrong.  I don’t believe it.  It’s little more than a scapegoat to avoid personal accountability.

That’s what rape is really…one person’s decision to behave very badly toward another, usually thinking it’s their right or entitlement, telling themselves and others that the victim had it coming and doesn’t really deserve sympathy.  And yet, I’ve read a number of reviews professing deep pity for the rapist male characters in the film “Teeth,” whining about how NO man deserves that sort of punishment.  But au contraire, rapists and asshole perverts surely do.

I wouldn’t go so far as to call this “feminist horror,” but it definitely gives you plenty to think about.  Made me think about those anti-rape devices being used elsewhere in the world that I posted about on my blog last year.  One looked like a spiked tampon that you insert.  Let me see if I can find a pic…

not_tampon2

It’s called Fem-Defense and is now available in Sweden.

Another method is the anti-rape condom pictured below:

antirape_condom

Rapex brand is worn internally like a female condom and has rows of sharp teeth that somehow embed in the penis upon penetration and require medical aid to remove.

Men won’t be happy to learn that instruments to guard against rape are in the works and are designed to cause penile harm.  Ah well.  Can’t expect much sympathy if your original aim was to abuse a woman.  Doesn’t seem fair that rape is as tolerated as it is, yet means to thwart or disrupt the frequency of rape come under fire as being unfair and/or dangerous to men.  Some things I will never understand…living in this so-called “man’s world.”

What really upsets me is that devices like these would even be necessary in the first place.  These are the times we live in, where women hide spikes in their vaginas to teach men that rape is wrong.  Damn tragedy that we could come so far and yet still be unable to effectively communicate and respect one another’s wishes and now must resort to taking such drastic measures.  “No” means “no”…and pussy spikes mean “no” too, in case that isn’t readily apparent for the dull and dim-witted.

This makes me nervous that other forms of violence toward women will escalate in response.

Leave a Comment

“Obama and the Nobel Prize: When War becomes Peace, When the Lie becomes the Truth”

Reprinted from AntiWar.com / October 10, 2009| News | Jason Ditz:

In the hopes he’s going to do, or not do, something

I’ve been thinking a lot about this Obama – Nobel Peace Prize business today, actually I’ve been trying to ignore it but I’ve run into several people today who think it’s a great idea and going to spur Obama to do something good… or at the very least spur him to not do something really, really bad.

But that’s not the way any of the other Nobel prizes work. Willard Boyle (one of this year’s Physics laureates) got it because 40 years ago he invented the CCD, which is an enormously valuable piece of technology. Herta Müller got the literature prize because she wrote some poetry people really liked.

Suppose the selection committee gave the Nobel Prize in Physics to some high school student in the hopes she’d be inspired to do something great. Suppose they gave the Prize in Medicine to an entry level employee at some drug company in the hopes he’d eventually discover something really useful. Wouldn’t we think they were putting the cart before the horse?

Another article on this same topic, from GlobalResearch.ca:

Obama and the Nobel Prize: When War becomes Peace, When the Lie becomes the Truth

by Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research / October 11, 2009:

When war becomes peace,

When concepts and realities are turned upside down,

When fiction becomes truth and truth becomes fiction.

When a global military agenda is heralded as a humanitarian endeavor,

When the killing of civilians is upheld as “collateral damage”,

When those who resist the US-NATO led invasion of their homeland are categorized as “insurgents” or “terrorists”.

When preemptive nuclear war is upheld as self defense.

When advanced torture and “interrogation” techniques are routinely used to “protect peacekeeping operations”,

When tactical nuclear weapons are heralded by the Pentagon as “harmless to the surrounding civilian population”

When three quarters of US personal federal income tax revenues are allocated to financing what is euphemistically referred to as “national defense”

When the Commander in Chief of the largest military force on planet earth is presented as a global peace-maker,

When the Lie becomes the Truth.

Obama’s “War Without Borders”

We are the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history. The US in partnership with NATO and Israel has launched a global military adventure which, in a very real sense, threatens the future of humanity.

At this critical juncture in our history, the Norwegian Nobel Committee’s decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to President and Commander in Chief Barack Obama constitutes an unmitigated tool of propaganda and distortion, which unreservedly supports the Pentagon’s “Long War”:  “A War without Borders” in the true sense of the word, characterised by the Worlwide deployment of US military might.

Apart from the diplomatic rhetoric, there has been no meaningful reversal of US foreign policy in relation to the George W. Bush presidency, which might have remotely justified the granting of the Nobel Prize to Obama. In fact quite the opposite. The Obama military agenda has sought to extend the war into new frontiers. With a new team of military and foreign policy advisers, the Obama war agenda has been far more effective in fostering military escalation than that formulated by the NeoCons.

Since the very outset of the Obama presidency, this global military project has become increasingly pervasive, with the reinforcement of US military presence in all major regions of the World  and the development of new advanced weapons systems on an unprecdented scale.

Granting the Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama provides legitimacy to the illegal practices of war, to the military occupation of foreign lands, to the relentless killings of civilians in the name of “democracy”.

Both the Obama administration and NATO are directly threatening Russia, China and Iran. The US under Obama is developing “a First Strike Global Missile Shield System”:

“Along with space-based weapons, the Airborne Laser is the next defense frontier. … Never has Ronald Reagan’s dream of layered missile defenses – Star Wars, for short – been as….close, at least technologically, to becoming realized.”

Reacting to this consolidation, streamlining and upgrading of American global nuclear strike potential, on August 11 the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air Force, the same Alexander Zelin cited earlier on the threat of U.S. strikes from space on all of his nation, said that the “Russian Air Force is preparing to meet the threats resulting from the creation of the Global Strike Command in the U.S. Air Force” and that Russia is developing “appropriate systems to meet the threats that may arise.” (Rick Rozoff, Showdown with Russia and China: U.S. Advances First Strike Global Missile Shield System, Global Research, August 19, 2009)

At no time since the Cuban missile crisis has the World been closer to the unthinkable: a World War III scenario, a global military conflict involving the use of nuclear weapons.

1. The so-called missile defense shield or Star Wars initiative involving the first strike use of nuclear weapons is now to be developed globally in different regions of the World. The missile shield is largely directed against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

2. New US military bases have been set up with a view to establishing US spheres of influence in every region of the World as well as surrounding and confronting Russia and China.

3. There has been an escalation in the Central Asian Middle East war. The “defense budget” under Obama has spiraled with increased allocations to both Afghanistan and Iraq.

4.  Under orders of president Obama, acting as Commander in Chief, Pakistan is now the object of routine US aerial bombardments in violation of its territorial sovereignty, using the “Global War on Terrorism” as a justification.

5. The construction of new military bases is envisaged in Latin America including Colombia on the immediate border of Venezuela.

6. Military aid to Israel has increased. The Obama presidency has expressed its unbending support for Israel and the Israeli military. Obama has remained mum on the atrocities committed by Israel in Gaza. There has not even been a semblance of renewed Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

7. There has been a reinforcement of the new regional commands including AFRICOM and SOUTHCOM

8. A new round of threats has been directed against Iran.

9. The US is intent upon fostering further divisions between Pakistan and India, which could lead to a regional war, as well as using India’s nuclear arsenal as an indirect means to threaten China.

The diabolical nature of this military project was outlined in the 2000 Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The PNAC’s declared objectives are:

defend the American homeland;

fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars;

perform the “constabulary” duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions;

transform U.S. forces to exploit the “revolution in military affairs;” (Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding Americas Defenses.pdf, September 2000)

The “Revolution in Military Affairs” refers to the development of new advanced weapons systems. The militarization of space, new advanced chemical and biological weapons, sophisticated laser guided missiles, bunker buster bombs, not to mention the US Air Force’s climatic warfare program (HAARP) based in Gokona, Alaska, are part of Obama’s  “humanitarian arsenal”.

War against the Truth

This is a war against the truth.  When war becomes peace, the world is turned upside down. Conceptualization is no longer possible.  An inquisitorial social system emerges.

An understanding of fundamental social and political events is replaced by a World of sheer fantasy, where “evil folks” are lurking. The objective of the “Global War on Terrorism” which has been fully endorsed by Obama administration has been to galvanize public support for a Worldwide campaign against heresy.

In the eyes of public opinion, possessing a “just cause” for waging war is central. A war is said to be Just if it is waged on moral, religious or ethical grounds. The consensus is to wage war. People can longer think for themselves. They accept the authority and  wisdom of the established social order.

The Nobel Committee says that President Obama has given the world “hope for a better future.” The prize is awarded for Obama’s

“extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”

…His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population. (Nobel Press Release, October 9, 2009)

The granting of the Nobel “peace prize” to president Barack Obama has become an integral part of the Pentagon’s propaganda machine. It provides a human face to the invaders, it upholds the demonization of those who oppose US military intervention.

The decision to grant Obama the Nobel  Peace Prize was no doubt carefully negotiated with the Norwegian Committee at the highest levels of the US government. It has far reaching implications.

It unequivocally upholds the US led war as a “Just Cause”. It erases the war crimes committed both by the Bush and Obama administrations.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (1)

SuperNews!

Mugged At The Gas Station:

Jabba the Rush:

Passive Aggressive Email Boxing:

A Night with Ann Coulter:

Too funny!

Leave a Comment

Frances Farmer / Kurt Cobain

Watched the film “Frances” about the life of ’40s actress Frances Farmer a couple days ago.  Never knew anything about her and haven’t watched any of her movies yet.  Word is that this movie is based on info from questionable sources, as was apparently the book titled “Will There Really Be a Morning?” which I haven’t read.  Her sister’s book “Look Back in Love” is said to be very insightful and well-documented, if you can find an affordable copy.

The jury’s still out on what exactly transpired in Frances Farmer’s life, but what we do know is the mental health establishment certainly did her no favors.  Scary.  I wouldn’t want to be committed in this day and age, let alone in the nutty ’40s and ’50s.  Super scary.  Poor woman.  All for what?  Not playing the game correctly?  Such bullshit.

R.I.P. Frances Farmer.  I hope to learn more about her as time goes on.

Speaking of tragic souls from Seattle, Kurt Cobain comes to mind.

Part 2: Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Crazy Love

The other day I watched the documentary “Crazy Love” (2007), about the “contorted love affair between Burt Pugach, a 32-year-old lawyer when the liaison began in the late 1950s, and the woman he pursued, a much younger Linda Riss.”  It’s a nearly unbelievable story that leaves you seriously wondering what the fuck you just watched.  Plenty to ponder here.

Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Kyle Grooms & Other Comedians

Got distracted on Wiretap Magazine.

Comedian Kyle Grooms, in a monologue titled “Slap the Donkey”:

Funny Career Builder ads:

Further sidelined by Dave Chapelle:

Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Thoughts on volunteering

I have an activist’s spirit without the idealist’s utopic vision. Resulting in a perpetual feeling of dissatisfaction. There’s so much to learn, so many organizations needing and deserving public support, but the liberal organizations stuck on trying to communicate with Congress irritate me. Sure, they mean well, but Congress obviously doesn’t give much of a damn what we commonfolk think. They may care what we do, but what we think is pretty well irrelevant. Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Lame, dope-smokin’, slackin’ little sucker you are

“Who’s gonna teach you how to dance, who’s gonna show you how to fly?   Who’s gonna call you on the lame dope-smokin’, slackin’, little fucker you are? … Who’s gonna get you from behind?  Who’s gonna ring your little bell?”

“I’m never gonna work another day in my life.  I’m way too busy power-trippin’…”

The actual lyrics by Monster Magnet: Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

You Are Not Alone

” …Never far away…always here to stay…”  Michael Jackson, you pulled a heart string in people.  Even I want to believe your child-like spirit was real.

Listening to “You Are Not Alone” on the playlist.  This song twists me up a  bit when I do listen.

Michael Jackson confuses the hell out of me.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »